Skip to main content

Jackson v. State

Citations

  • 139 A.3d 976
  • 448 Md. 387
  • 2016 Md. LEXIS 369
  • 2016 WL 3449826

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e choose not to remand for inclusion of further findings [] because of the obvious futility of [Petitioner’s] assertions.”
  • “[W]e choose not to remand for inclusion of further findings [] because of the obvious futility of [Petitioner’s] assertions.”
  • “[W]e determine that Jackson’s 2015 Petition was properly denied without a hearing by the Circuit Court, albeit without [it] including factual findings; we choose not to remand for inclusion of further findings, however, because of the obvious futility of Jackson’s assertions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Battaglia, Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Hotten, Wilner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.