Skip to main content

Gregg v. State

Citations

  • 976 A.2d 999
  • 409 Md. 698
  • 2009 Md. LEXIS 564

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Crim. Proc. § 8-201 “provide[s] a remedy for persons convicted of serious crimes for which they are actually innocent.”
  • establishing that although statutes are normally presumed to operate prospectively, statutes like CP § 8-201 that have a remedial effect and amendments thereto that only provide procedural changes may be given retrospective applica tion
  • ordering testing of epithelial cells collected by police from the trigger of the murder weapon where identification was in issue and the defendant had accused the fellow occupant of his vehicle of being the true murderer
  • “[Crim. Proc. §] 8-201 does not mandate a hearing on a petition brought under [Crim. Proc.] § 8-201.” (citation omitted)
  • “[Crim. Proc. §] 8-201 does not mandate a hearing on a petition brought under [Crim. Proc.] § 8-201.” (citation omitted)
  • “we do not interpret legislative acts to have been done for nonsensical reasons, nor do we construe statutory language in a manner that renders a portion of the law nugatory or superfluous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbera

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.