Arey v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, after the State presents its case, “[t]he burden of production then shifts to the petitioner to demonstrate that the evidence actually exists”
• stating that, after the State presents its case, \[t]he burden of production then shifts to the petitioner to demonstrate that the evidence actually exists\
• listing numerous possible places where the evidence might be found, and stating that “[searching the ECU alone was insufficient”
• listing numerous possible places where the evidence might be found, and stating that \[s]earching the ECU alone was insufficient\
• identifying the purpose under-girding the General Assembly’s enactment of § 8-201
• “[A] court should not conclude that evidence no longer exists until the State performs a reasonable search for the requested evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).