Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 8/31/2015

Satterfield v. Maldonado

Citations

  • 127 F. Supp. 3d 177
  • 2015 WL 5098103

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • setting forth “normal” values for range of motion in the lumbar spine’s flexion, extension and lateral flexion
  • “Where the parties are domiciled in different states, the locus of the tort will almost always be determinative in cases involving conduct-regulating laws.” (quoting Krock v. Lipsay, 97 F.3d 640, 646 (2d Cir. 1996))
  • “While there is no set percentage for determining whether a limitation in range of motion is sufficient to establish ‘serious injury,’ the cases have generally found that a limitation of twenty percent or more is significant for summary judgment purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Francis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.