· 7/9/1997
Softel, Inc. v. Dragon Medical And Scientific Communications, Inc.
Citations
- 118 F.3d 955
- 43 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1385
- 38 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 623
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 16808
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the balance of factors weighed in favor of affirming the lower court’s decision to preclude
- affirming magistrate judge and district judge’s order to preclude expert reports submitted past discovery cutoff date
- utilizing the Outley factors to review a district court's decision to exclude expert testimony
- the importance of the testimony of plaintiff’s precluded witness cut “only slightly” in plaintiff’s favor, where plaintiff could use its president as an expert
- “the pending discovery dispute over the timing and scope of expert discovery will have a material impact on what, if any, expert report is ultimately exchanged by Ikonick”
- “origination” and “false designation of origin” elements of a “reverse palming off’ claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.