Skip to main content
· 7/9/1997

Softel, Inc. v. Dragon Medical And Scientific Communications, Inc.

Citations

  • 118 F.3d 955
  • 43 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1385
  • 38 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 623
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 16808

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the balance of factors weighed in favor of affirming the lower court’s decision to preclude
  • affirming magistrate judge and district judge’s order to preclude expert reports submitted past discovery cutoff date
  • utilizing the Outley factors to review a district court's decision to exclude expert testimony
  • the importance of the testimony of plaintiff’s precluded witness cut “only slightly” in plaintiff’s favor, where plaintiff could use its president as an expert
  • “the pending discovery dispute over the timing and scope of expert discovery will have a material impact on what, if any, expert report is ultimately exchanged by Ikonick”
  • “origination” and “false designation of origin” elements of a “reverse palming off’ claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.