Richard S. RASKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the WYATT COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a district court ‘has broad discretion in choosing whether to admit evidence’ on a motion for summary judgment.
• noting that a district court ‘has broad discretion in choosing whether to admit evidence’ on a motion for summary judgment.
• stating that “an expert’s report is not a talisman against summary judgment”
• stating that “an expert’s report is not a talisman against summary judgment”
• noting that “only admissible evidence need be considered by the trial court in ruling on a motion for summary judgment,” and the Federal Rules of Evidence govern such admissibility
• explaining that district court has broad discretion in deciding whether to admit evidence, that we therefore review evidentiary rulings for manifest error, and that this “same standard of review applies to a district court’s evidentiary rulings on expert testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).