Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 9/23/1996

Krock v. Lipsay

Citations

  • 97 F.3d 640

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a materially identical choice of law provision did not encompass tort claim for fraudulent misrepresentation
  • stating that a “sufficiently broad” choice-of-law clause would reach claims of tort arising incident to the contract
  • stating that a “sufficiently broad” choice-of-law clause would reach claims of tort arising incident to the contract
  • “This [Finance Agreement] shall be governed and construed under the laws of the State of New York.”
  • “Under New York law, a choice-of-law provision indicating that the contract will be governed by a certain body of law does not dispositively determine that law which will govern a claim of fraud arising incident to the contract.”
  • “Under New York law, a choice-of-law provision indicating that the contract will be governed by a certain body of law does not dispositively determine that law which will govern a claim of fraud arising incident to the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.