Skip to main content

Diamond v. Diamond

Citations

  • 792 A.2d 597
  • 2002 Pa. Super. 34
  • 2002 Pa. Super. LEXIS 108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • litigant’s attorney found in contempt of order directing her to pay for accidental destruction of documents
  • contemnor who received notice and an opportunity for explanation and defense was afforded due process
  • “a contempt order is appealable because it is a final order imposing sanctions”
  • “when the contempt proceedings are predicated on a violation of a court order that followed a full hearing, ‘due process requires no more than notice of the violations alleged and an opportunity for explanation and defense’”
  • stating contempt order with sanctions is final and appealable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Todd, and Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.