Skip to main content
· 10/5/2010

Santiago Ex Rel. C.S. v. Bloise

Citations

  • 741 F. Supp. 2d 357
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106213
  • 2010 WL 3895340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing plaintiff’s failure to train claim on the grounds that the complaint only alleges “facts about a specific incident[,]” which is insufficient to support the inference that the alleged failure to train constituted an official municipal policy
  • “Evidence of this single event is insufficient support for the court to conclude a policy of deliberate indifference.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.