Skip to main content
· 8/7/2012

Singh v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 881 F. Supp. 2d 76
  • 2012 WL 3193594
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110187

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding deliberate indifference where plaintiff reported harassment by a police officer on five separate occasions
  • finding the requisite specificity where a plaintiff alleged he was harassed by the same, small group of MPD officers “on five separate occasions” and “nothing was done to stop, discipline, or investigate the defendant officers”
  • finding the requisite specificity where a plaintiff alleged he was harassed 24 by the same, small group of MPD officers “on five separate occasions” and “nothing was done to stop, discipline, or investigate the defendant officers”
  • refusing to dismiss the plaintiff’s § 1983 claim where the plaintiff had made three complaints to the MPD within the span of two months and stated at two hearings that he was being harassed by MPD
  • sufficient notice when a plaintiff reported harassment by the same officers “on five separate occasions” in the same year
  • allegations that plaintiff had three traffic tickets over the span of eighteen days and reported the harassment on five separate occasions adequately alleged custom or policy of deliberate indifference to harassment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Rudolph Contreras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.