· 3/13/2002
NEPSK, Inc. v. Town of Houlton
Citations
- 283 F.3d 1
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3872
- 2002 WL 373056
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- comparing non-responsiveness in the context of a Rule 12(c) motion for judgment' on the pleadings and Rule 56 motion for summary judgment
- affirming dismissal based on failure to object to motion to dismiss under Rule 12(c)
- “Courts in the District of Maine routinely apply [Local Rule] 7(b) in situations where the opposing party fails to file an objection to a motion, regardless of whether the motion is dispositive.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Lynch, Lipez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.