Skip to main content
· 3/13/2002

NEPSK, Inc. v. Town of Houlton

Citations

  • 283 F.3d 1
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3872
  • 2002 WL 373056

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • comparing non-responsiveness in the context of a Rule 12(c) motion for judgment' on the pleadings and Rule 56 motion for summary judgment
  • affirming dismissal based on failure to object to motion to dismiss under Rule 12(c)
  • “Courts in the District of Maine routinely apply [Local Rule] 7(b) in situations where the opposing party fails to file an objection to a motion, regardless of whether the motion is dispositive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Lynch, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.