Hicks v. Brysch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that procedural prerequisites of Tex. Civ. Prac. Rem. Code Ann. ch. 14 do not impermissibly restrict inmates' right to court access
• holding that procedural prerequisites of TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. ch. 14 do not impermissibly restrict inmates’ right to court access
• holding that the constitutional right did not encompass the right to compel court clerks to furnish an inmate with free legal advice about the proper manner for complying with procedural rules
• establishing an officials task as discretionary before continuing the analysis when seeking monetary damages in defendants’ individual capacity
• \Restrictions on the ability o[f] indigent prisoners to proceed [i]n [f]orma [p]auperis do not implicate any constitutionally-protected right per se.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).