Skip to main content
· 9/10/2008

Thigpen v. United Parcel Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 990 So. 2d 639
  • 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 13824
  • 2008 WL 4146663

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence because (1) it was too remote in time and purpose to be relevant, and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.