S-A-K- and H-A-H
Citations
- 24 I. & N. Dec. 464
Syllabus
S-A-K- and H-A-H-, 24 I&N Dec. 464 (BIA 2008) ID 3602 (PDF) A mother and daughter from Somalia who provided sufficient evidence of past persecution in the form of female genital mutilation with aggravated circumstances are eligible for a grant of asylum based on humanitarian grounds pursuant to 8 C.F.R § 1208.13(b)(1)(iii)(A) (2007), regardless of whether they can establish a well-founded fear of future persecution. Matter of Chen, 20 I&N Dec. 16 (BIA 1989), followed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that applicants subject to past FGM with aggravated circumstances are eligible for a grant of asylum based on humanitarian grounds regardless of whether they can establish a well-founded fear of persecution
- stating that female genital mutilation is a \continuing harm\ that \has ongoing physical and emotional effects\
- \[T]he fact that FGM is generally performed only once ... eliminat[es] the risk of identical future persecution.\
- “[T]he fact that FGM is generally performed only once ... eliminat[es] the risk of identical future persecution.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bah v. MukaseySecond Circuit· 2008-06-11· cited 1,199×
- Kone v. HolderSecond Circuit· 2010-02-25· cited 91×
- A-TBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2009-07-01· cited 22×
- Sumbundu v. HolderSecond Circuit· 2010-04-07· cited 19×
- A-TBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2008-07-01· cited 18×
- Jie Hin Shu v. United States Department of JusticeSecond Circuit· 2008-06-27
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Khadija Mohammed v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, Khadija Ahmed Mohamed v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2005-03-10· cited 1,722×
- CHENBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1989-07-01· cited 297×
- KASINGABoard of Immigration Appeals· 1996-07-01· cited 184×
- Adelaide Abankwah v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceSecond Circuit· 1999-05-03· cited 127×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.