Adelaide Abankwah v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding plaintiff was not in either imminent or ongoing danger 27 and denying him ability to proceed in forma pauperis as three strikes litigant
• “INS regulations do not require that credible testimony — that which is consistent and specific — be corroborated by objective evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).