Skip to main content
· 7/1/2004

Mayeaux v. Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Co.

Citations

  • 376 F.3d 420
  • 32 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2928
  • 58 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1013
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 13685
  • 2004 WL 1472715

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district court may not deny leave to amend unless there is a “substantial reason”
  • noting that an amendment that “would fundamentally alter the nature of the case” may be denied
  • affirming denial of leave to amend where amendment would fundamentally alter the nature of the case
  • denying a motion to amend a pleading that would have fundamentally altered the nature of the case and imposed additional discovery requirements and undue prejudice on the nonmoving party
  • finding good cause not supported where proposed amendment fundamentally altered the nature of the case as opposed to proposing alternative legal theories for recovery on the same underlying facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Wiener, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.