· 7/1/2004
Mayeaux v. Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Co.
Citations
- 376 F.3d 420
- 32 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2928
- 58 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1013
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 13685
- 2004 WL 1472715
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a district court may not deny leave to amend unless there is a “substantial reason”
- noting that an amendment that “would fundamentally alter the nature of the case” may be denied
- affirming denial of leave to amend where amendment would fundamentally alter the nature of the case
- denying a motion to amend a pleading that would have fundamentally altered the nature of the case and imposed additional discovery requirements and undue prejudice on the nonmoving party
- finding good cause not supported where proposed amendment fundamentally altered the nature of the case as opposed to proposing alternative legal theories for recovery on the same underlying facts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Wiener, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.