Skip to main content
· 8/19/2011

Renfro v. Unisys Corp.

Citations

  • 671 F.3d 314
  • 51 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1609
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17208
  • 2011 WL 3630121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding “the range of investment options ... [is a] highly relevant fact[ ] ... against which the plausibility of claims ... should be measured”
  • deciding “the range of investment options . . . [is a] highly relevant fact[] . . . against which the plausibility of claims . . . should be measured”
  • stating that blanket assertions and conclusory statements by themselves do not suffice to show plausibility
  • holding a service provider was “not yet a plan fiduciary at the time it negotiated” fees
  • holding a service provider “was not yet a plan fiduciary at the time it negotiated the fee compensation” under an agreement
  • stating that blanket assertions and conclusory statements by themselves do not suffice to show plausibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scirica, Ambro, Vanaskie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.