Skip to main content

Ruffin v. State

Citations

  • 656 S.E.2d 140
  • 283 Ga. 87
  • 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 95
  • 2008 Ga. LEXIS 18

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the appellant was not entitled to a new trial because he failed to allege specific harm from the absence of a transcript of voir dire, opening statements, bench conferences, and the polling of the jury
  • holding that the appellant was not entitled to a new trial because he failed to allege specific harm from the absence of a transcript of voir dire, opening statements, bench conferences, and the polling of the jury
  • noting principle that trial counsel’s performance cannot be deemed deficient for failing to locate defense witness whose existence was not brought to counsel’s attention
  • noting principle that trial counsel’s performance cannot be deemed deficient for failing to locate defense witness whose existence was not brought to counsel’s attention
  • affirming conviction because defendant failed to allege specific harm from the absence of a transcript of voir dire, opening statements, bench conferences, and the polling of the jury
  • “Grand jury proceedings are confidential and thus appellant was not entitled to a transcript of those proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.