Skip to main content

Cruz v. State

Citations

  • 700 S.E.2d 631
  • 305 Ga. App. 805
  • 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2792
  • 2010 Ga. App. LEXIS 770

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendants waived appellate review of their claim that they could not understand the Spanish translations provided during their trial, which they raised for the first time in their motions for a new trial
  • explaining that defendant must demonstrate actual prejudice when claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel based upon alleged juror misconduct
  • affirming denial of an ineffective assistance claim when trial counsel could 13 (c
  • affirming denial of an ineffective assistance claim when trial counsel could not recall the reason for a trial decision but when the record supported the trial court’s finding that the decision was reasonable trial strategy
  • “[i]t is the function of the trial court at the hearing on the motion for new trial to determine witness credibility and to resolve any conflicts in the testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackburn, Barnes, Mikell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.