Shelton R. Thomas v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant had no constitutional right to be present at a status conference, as that is not a critical stage of the proceedings
• noting that the trial court \did not break down the overall pretrial delay into relevant time periods and assign responsibility for delay to each time period\
• affirming the denial of a plea in abatement challenging the indictment because the defendant failed to show that the objected-to \statements were the only evidence presented to the grand jury\
• remanding case to the trial court for completion of the record on the basis that the record on appeal did not contain sufficient information for this Court to address appellant’s enumeration of error
• remanding case to the trial court for completion of the record on the basis that the record on appeal did not contain sufficient information for this Court to address appellant’s enumeration of error
• “Generally, with regard to the efficacy of an indictment, no inquiry into the sufficiency or legality of the evidence is indulged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).