Rubke v. Capitol Bancorp Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that it is axiomatic that there can be no omission claim when the allegedly undisclosed information was in the public domain before the IPO
• “A claim under section 11 based on the omission of information must 21 demonstrate that the omitted information existed at the time the registration statement 22 became effective.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).