Hildes Ex Rel. David & Kathleen Hildes 1999 Charitable Remainder Unitrust v. Arthur Andersen LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the rule that “overcoming a 15 negative causation defense requires merely that the misrepresentation touches upon the 16 reasons for an investment’s decline in value”
• “[Plaintiffs] need only show a 27 material misstatement or omission to establish [a] prima facie case.”
• “[B]ecause the exchange of shares—which occurred after the Registration Statement was filed—constituted Hildes’ acquisition of those securities pursuant to a registration statement, he has stated a potentially meritorious Section 11 claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).