Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 2/13/2013

In re Facebook, Inc.

Citations

  • 922 F. Supp. 2d 445
  • 2013 WL 525158

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Delaware courts are reluctant to find valid Brophy claims based on “soft” information such as trends or projections of performance
  • noting that a court may resolve the threshold question of venue before addressing jurisdiction
  • stating that “this Circuit does not appear to recognize the doctrine”
  • focusing on use of the term “exclusive” rather than modifying phrase “to the fullest extent permitted by law”
  • “Derivative Plaintiffs have not alleged particularized facts that support an inference that the Board possessed information that was materially different from what existed in the marketplace.”
  • rejecting “generic accusations” about directors selling stock in an IPO

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sweet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.