S.D. New York· 2/13/2013
In re Facebook, Inc.
Citations
- 922 F. Supp. 2d 445
- 2013 WL 525158
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that Delaware courts are reluctant to find valid Brophy claims based on “soft” information such as trends or projections of performance
- noting that a court may resolve the threshold question of venue before addressing jurisdiction
- stating that “this Circuit does not appear to recognize the doctrine”
- focusing on use of the term “exclusive” rather than modifying phrase “to the fullest extent permitted by law”
- “Derivative Plaintiffs have not alleged particularized facts that support an inference that the Board possessed information that was materially different from what existed in the marketplace.”
- rejecting “generic accusations” about directors selling stock in an IPO
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sweet
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re Facebook, Inc., IPO Securities & Derivative LitigationS.D. New York· 2013-12-12· cited 43×
- North ex rel. Chemed Corp. v. McNamaraS.D. Ohio· 2014-09-19· cited 32×
- Tlapanco v. ElgesS.D. New York· 2016-09-15· cited 28×
- SC Note Acquisitions, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.E.D. New York· 2013-03-27· cited 15×
- In re Galena Biopharma, Inc.D. Oregon· 2015-02-04· cited 6×
- Haith ex rel. Accretive Health, Inc. v. BronfmanN.D. Illinois· 2013-03-01· cited 5×
- Butorin ex rel. KBR Inc. v. BlountS.D. Texas· 2015-03-31· cited 4×
- Davis v. Gutierrez, et al.D. New Hampshire· 2018-03-27· cited 2×
- in Re: Bruno Kubler, in His Capacity as Insolvency Administrator of Thielert Aircraft Engines GMBHTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2017-08-04
- Sylebra Capital Partners Master Fund v. Ronald O. PerelmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2020-10-09
- In Re: SmileDirectClub, Inc. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2021-05-28
- Logicorp Mexico SA De CV v. Jorge AndradeTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2022-12-01
- Logicorp Mexico SA De CV v. Jorge AndradeTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2023-01-26
- Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Alexander C. Karp.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2025-04-25
Cites
71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court· 1949-06-20· cited 10,863×
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 3,455×
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1999-05-17· cited 3,295×
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court· 2007-03-05· cited 1,961×
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 1,382×
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 1,291×
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-03-01· cited 1,206×
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court· 1969-11-10· cited 1,046×
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware· 2000-02-09· cited 877×
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Second Circuit· 1993-12-17· cited 848×
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1993-12-23· cited 768×
- Ohio Forestry Assn., Inc. v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court· 1998-05-26· cited 757×
- Pettus v. MorgenthauSecond Circuit· 2009-01-28· cited 567×
- Glassman v. Computervision Corp.First Circuit· 1996-07-31· cited 495×
- Phillips v. Audio Active Ltd.Second Circuit· 2007-07-24· cited 434×
- In Re Caremark International Inc. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1996-09-25· cited 387×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.