Mannkind Securities Actions

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[the officers] should have known” that tasing the plaintiff – who was “standing on a small, unenclosed ledge ten feet off the ground” – “was unrea- sonable even despite the lack of precedent involving tasers used under similar circumstances”
• denying a motion for summary judgment by an offi- ' cer who used a Taser on a suspect who was “standing on a small, unenclosed ledge ten feet off the ground,” which caused the suspect to the ground, fatally injuring him
• “Generally, whether qualified immunity applies to the conduct of a law enforcement officer is a question of law for the court to decide.” (citing Stephenson v. Doe, 332 F.3d 68, 80-81 (2d Cir.2003))
• opining similarly on summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).