Skip to main content

Mathews v. State

Citations

  • 877 S.E.2d 188
  • 314 Ga. 360

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the jury was authorized to conclude that the appellant was guilty of felony 11 murder based on aggravated assault, even though the evidence presented at trial did not establish whether he or his co-defendant shot the murder victim, because they shared a common criminal intent
  • stating that “[c]riminal 6 intent is a question for the jury, and it may be inferred from that person’s conduct before, during, and after the commission of the crime” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • explaining that the evidence can be sufficient as a matter of constitutional due process to support a defendant’s felony murder conviction even when the defendant was not the one who fired the fatal shot
  • rejecting the appellant’s claim that counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to move for a directed verdict because there was sufficient evidence to support his convictions
  • “[E]ven assuming that [the defendant] did not fire the shot that killed [the victim] or shoot at [the second victim], the trial evidence shows that [the defendant] shared [the co-defendant’s] criminal intent to shoot at the victims because [the defendant] committed the same acts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.