Skip to main content

Huffman v. State

Citations

  • 860 S.E.2d 721
  • 311 Ga. 891

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the appellant “need not have had experience with the justice system to understand what was said during the reading of his Miranda rights”
  • explaining that a detective’s reading of the Miranda warnings “was not so rushed as to be unintelligible absent familiarity with Miranda”
  • “a written waiver is not necessary where a suspect is orally advised of his or her rights and subsequently waives those rights through his or her responses” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.