Skip to main content

Roseboro v. State

Citations

  • 841 S.E.2d 706
  • 308 Ga. 428

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • lineup not impermissibly suggestive where none of the circumstances of the lineup’s presentation led the witness to a “virtually inevitable identification of [the suspect] as the perpetrator” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • “[B]ecause [the appellant] has not made a showing that had a motion been filed, the evidence would have been suppressed, we agree with the trial court’s conclusion that trial counsel was not deficient.”
  • even assuming that OCGA § 17-20-2 applies to a procedure in which a photo lineup was conducted using pictures on a phone, non-compliance with the statute would not result in the automatic exclusion of an identification
  • “Because [the appellant] has not made a showing that had a motion been filed, the evidence would have been suppressed, we agree with the trial court’s conclusion that trial counsel was not deficient.”
  • “Given that neither of [appellant’s] enumerations of error amount to deficient performance on the part of trial counsel, [his] argument that the cumulative harm of these failures . . . affected the outcome of trial is without merit.” (citation and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.