Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 692 S.E.2d 374
  • 286 Ga. 884
  • 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 1033
  • 2010 Ga. LEXIS 285

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress where there was “nothing unduly suggestive in the photographic identification procedure . . . that would compel suppression of the identification evidence”
  • “ ‘An unduly suggestive procedure is one which leads the witness to the virtually inevitable identification of the defendant as the perpetrator, and is equivalent to the authorities telling the witness, “This is our suspect.’”” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.