Skip to main content

Ivey v. State

Citations

  • 596 S.E.2d 612
  • 277 Ga. 875
  • 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 1714
  • 2004 Ga. LEXIS 407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that officer’s question whether “one of the guys pictured is the one [who committed the crimes]” did not lead the witness “to the inevitable identification of [the defendant] as the perpetrator” (punctuation omitted)
  • “The ‘totality of the circumstances’ test for reliability ... applies to extra-judicial pretrial identification procedures such as lineups, showups and photographic displays, not to the in-court procedures used in this case.”
  • pre-trial identification procedure not impermissibly suggestive, even though it would have been preferable for officer to give the witness a standard admonition that lineup may or may not have had picture of perpetrator
  • pretrial identification procedure not impermissibly suggestive, even though it would have been preferable for officer to give the witness a standard admonition that lineup may or may not have had picture of perpetrator
  • “ ‘An identification procedure is impermissibly suggestive when it leads the witness to an all but inevitable identification of the defendant as the perpetrator or is the equivalent of the authorities telling the witness, “This is our suspect.” ’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.