Skip to main content

Clark v. State

Citations

  • 611 S.E.2d 38
  • 279 Ga. 243
  • 16 A.L.R. 6th 891
  • 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 946
  • 2005 Ga. LEXIS 241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “the trial court was authorized to find that there was no impermissible suggestiveness” where the witness identified the defendant in two lineup spreads and the defendant’s photograph was the only one to appear in both
  • finding existence of some variation among 14 photographs in array did not cause array to be impermissibly suggestive
  • Where the uncontradicted evidence in the record “shows completion 7 only of the greater offenses, it is unnecessary for the trial court to charge on the lesser offenses.”
  • “Where, as here, the evidence in the record shows completion only of the greater offense, it is unnecessary for the trial court to charge on the lesser offense.”
  • no abuse of discretion in trial court’s ruling that a lineup was not impermissibly suggestive where the witness was shown two lineups and the defendant’s photo was the only photo to appear in both

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.