Rosario v. Livaditis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, while a “satisfied” class member may have suffered less injury, that is not to say that the member suffered “no injury,” and the typicality requirement was deemed satisfied
• certifying a class even though some class members may have suffered no damages at all
• remanding for a new trial on damages because in a RICO case, the jury found liability but \did not award even nominal damages on the RICO counts\
• rejecting contention that typicality and adequacy requirements were not met based upon contention that some class members were “satisfied” with educational services challenged as fraudulent
• “The question of typicality in Rule 23(a)(3) is closely related to the ... question of commonality.”
• “The question of typicality in Rule 23(a)(3) is closely related to the ... question of commonality.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Rosario v. Livaditis

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Rosario v. Livaditis
  Seventh Circuit· 1992-07-07· cited 73×