Karen L. Keele, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Norman Paul Wexler, Mitchell Wexler and Wexler and Wexler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the FDCPA does not require proof of actual damages as a precursor to the recovery of statutory damages
• holding there is no fraud exception to the FDCPA, thus it is irrelevant whether members of the class may have intended that their checks would be dishonored
• noting that the language of the FDCPA “fo‐ cuses primarily, if not exclusively on the conduct of debt col‐ lectors, not debtors”
• noting that the language of the FDCPA “fo‐ cuses primarily, if not exclusively on the conduct of debt col‐ lectors, not debtors”
• noting that some “factual variations among class members’ grievances do not defeat a class action”
• finding that named plaintiffs claim was typical because class members were all suing under FDCPA “alleging violations of the same statutory sections under the same legal theory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).