Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 8/11/2000

Maio v. Aetna, Inc.

Citations

  • 221 F.3d 472
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19172
  • 2000 WL 1137688

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that allegations of damage to such “intangible property interest[s]” are insufficient as a matter of law
  • holding that a RICO injury must be a “concrete financial loss and not merely injury to a valuable intangible property interest”
  • holding that allegations of damage to such “intangible property interest[s]” are insufficient as a matter of law
  • holding no RICO cause of action because factual predicate necessary for damages to be incurred at all too speculative
  • noting that a showing of injury requires proof of a concrete financial loss and not mere injury to an intangible property interest
  • noting that a showing of injury requires proof of a concrete financial loss and not mere injury to an intangible property interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greenberg, Schwartz, Weis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

173 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.