Robert E. Pincus v. Pabst Brewing Company, a Delaware Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Plaintiff’s decision to stay on the job after a new arbitration program was rolled out showed her mutual promise to arbitrate disputes with her employer
• \[T]he promise of a right of first refusal provided by Pabst [employer] was exchanged for the promise by Pincus [employee] to continue employment under changed circumstances.\
• \[T]he promise of a right of first refusal provided by Pabst [employer] was exchanged for the promise by Pincus [employee] to continue employment under changed circumstances.\
• “As terse as it was, and as unfavorable to Pabst as ensuing events proved it to be, the Pabst–Pincus agreement was not susceptible to more than one construction.”
• “fixing of a damage award- is an exercise in fact-finding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).