Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statute of limitations defense raised for the first time on appeal was barred
• rejecting employer's argument that its age policy should be upheld \as long as that policy is `not the result of an arbitrary belief lacking in objective reason or rationale'....\
• rejecting employer’s argument that its age policy should be upheld “as long as that policy is ‘not the result of an arbitrary belief lacking in objective reason or rationale’____”
• suggesting not worth judge’s time where small amount of $1,000 requested
• the court's simultaneous treatment of both prongs of the BFOQ inquiry prompts confusion from its discussion of minimum standards and of impossible or impracticable individual testing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).