First Circuit· 7/9/2019
Twum v. Barr
Citations
- 930 F.3d 10
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining the juxtaposition of conflicting case precedent about whether particular eligibility determinations provide objective criteria
- noting some tension in our case law on this point and concluding we lack jurisdiction to review a petitioner's eligibility for a different form of discretionary relief
- “It is evident without question that the statute leaves final determination on whether to grant timeliness waivers . . . to the Attorney General’s discretion and so places those deci- sions beyond our review.”
- “we tend to agree with SRI that the human mind is not 19 equipped to detect suspicious activity by using network monitors and analyzing network 20 packets as recited by the claims.”
- “Section 285 permits a prevailing party to recover reasonable 22 attorneys’ fees.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Stahl, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pankajkumar Patel v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2020-08-19· cited 97×
- Adeyanju v. GarlandFirst Circuit· 2022-02-24· cited 36×
- Arfan Yasin v. Attorney General United StatesThird Circuit· 2021-12-20· cited 9×
- Djokro v. GarlandFirst Circuit· 2024-05-17· cited 4×
- Tulung v. GarlandFirst Circuit· 2024-05-21· cited 2×
- Lucaj v. WilkinsonFirst Circuit· 2021-03-10
- Arsen Sarkisov v. Pamela BondiSixth Circuit· 2025-11-21
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kucana v. HolderSupreme Court· 2010-01-20· cited 858×
- Smith v. City of JacksonSupreme Court· 2005-03-30· cited 580×
- A-BBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2018-07-01· cited 277×
- Fidel Angel Hernandez-Barrera v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralFirst Circuit· 2004-06-09· cited 128×
- Raza v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2007-04-19· cited 103×
- El Moraghy v. AshcroftFirst Circuit· 2003-06-12· cited 99×
- Zhang v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceFirst Circuit· 2003-11-03· cited 81×
- Fergiste v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceFirst Circuit· 1998-03-12· cited 63×
- San Juan Cable LLC v. Puerto Rico Telephone Co.First Circuit· 2010-07-15· cited 53×
- Larngar v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2009-04-06· cited 47×
- Silva v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2006-09-15· cited 42×
- Rosario v. HolderSecond Circuit· 2010-12-06· cited 38×
- Elysee v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2006-02-21· cited 38×
- Grace v. WhitakerD.C. Circuit· 2018-12-17· cited 38×
- Smith v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2010-09-09· cited 36×
- Guzman-Munoz v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2013-07-29· cited 35×
- Jutus v. Holder, Jr.First Circuit· 2013-07-17· cited 24×
- Xin Qiang Liu v. LynchFirst Circuit· 2015-09-11· cited 22×
- Haizem Liu v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2013-08-13· cited 21×
- Bbale v. LynchFirst Circuit· 2016-10-24· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.