Supreme Court· 4/20/1970

Rosado v. Wyman

Citations

397 U.S. 397
90 S. Ct. 1207
25 L. Ed. 2d 442
1970 U.S. LEXIS 53

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the common sense policy of pendant jurisdiction ensures conservation of judicial resources and avoids multiplicity of litigation
stating that three-judge court must decide non-constitutional claims “in preference to deciding the original constitutional claim” for which court convened
noting that matters such as statute of limitation problems and amount of time and resources expended should be considered prior to dismissing pendant state claims
holding Secretary’s authority to withhold funds under § 604 does not preclude private actions to enforce individual rights under Title IV-A of the Social Security Act
noting that a federal court does not lose diversity jurisdiction when one of the parties later changes domicile or the amount in controversy falls short of the requisite amount
noting that a federal | court does not lose jurisdiction over a diversity action which was well founded at the outset even though the amount recoverable falls short of the statutory minimum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harlan, Douglas, Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,074 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Rosado v. Wyman

11 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.