Second Circuit· 12/21/1970
Rosado v. Wyman
Citations
- 437 F.2d 619
- 14 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1073
- 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 5870
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the entry of a permanent injunction left the preliminary injunction “technically no longer operative” such that an appeal from the preliminary injunction was moot
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Grotrian, Helfferich, Schulz, Th. Steinweg Nachf. v. Steinway & SonsSecond Circuit· 1975-07-09· cited 209×
- Cooper v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-07-02· cited 71×
- Irvin E. Schermer Trust v. Sun Equities Corp.D. Minnesota· 1987-06-25· cited 18×
- Johnson v. WhiteD. Connecticut· 1972-06-12· cited 10×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court· 1969-06-09· cited 2,928×
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 1,401×
- Kennedy Park Homes Ass'n v. City of LackawannaSecond Circuit· 1970-12-07· cited 119×
- Zippo Manufacturing Company v. Rogers Imports, Inc.S.D. New York· 1963-04-22· cited 87×
- Wyman v. RothsteinSupreme Court· 1970-06-01· cited 55×
- Rosado v. WymanE.D. New York· 1970-10-27· cited 55×
- Rothstein v. WymanS.D. New York· 1969-08-04· cited 45×
- Rosado v. WymanSecond Circuit· 1970-12-21· cited 19×
- Rosado v. WymanE.D. New York· 1969-05-12· cited 12×
- Boddie v. WymanN.D. New York· 1970-10-02· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.