Rollerblade, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that presumption of correctness “is irrelevant where there is no factual dispute between the parties”
• stating that, where there are no disputed issues of material fact, “no deference attaches to Customs’ classification decisions either under 28 U.S.C. § 2639 or under [the] Chevron [doctrine]”
• stating it is the Court’s duty “to ‘reach the correct decision in classification cases....’ ”
• “[T]he statutory presumption of correctness under § 2639 is irrelevant where there is no factual dispute between the parties.”
• “We reiterate here that no Chevron deference applies to classification decisions by Customs.”
• legal issues are not afforded deference under 28 U.S.C. § 2639 or under the administrative deference standard promulgated in Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).