Federal Circuit· 4/24/1997

Rollerblade, Inc. v. United States

Citations

112 F.3d 481
19 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1097
1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 8397
1997 WL 198119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that presumption of correctness “is irrelevant where there is no factual dispute between the parties”
stating that, where there are no disputed issues of material fact, “no deference attaches to Customs’ classification decisions either under 28 U.S.C. § 2639 or under [the] Chevron [doctrine]”
stating it is the Court’s duty “to ‘reach the correct decision in classification cases....’ ”
“[T]he statutory presumption of correctness under § 2639 is irrelevant where there is no factual dispute between the parties.”
“We reiterate here that no Chevron deference applies to classification decisions by Customs.”
legal issues are not afforded deference under 28 U.S.C. § 2639 or under the administrative deference standard promulgated in Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rich, Clevenger, Bryson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Rollerblade, Inc. v. United States

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.