Simod America Corp. v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that sample of subject merchandise can be “a potent witness”
• emphasis added; citing Hecht Pearl Co. v. United States, 18 C.C.P.A. (Customs) 171, 175 (1930)
• emphasis added; citing Hecht Pearl Co. v. United States, 18 C.C.P.A. (Customs) 171, 175 (1930)
• “[T]he merchandise itself is often a potent witness in classification cases.”
• “[T]he merchandise itself is often a potent witness in classification cases.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).