Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing the differences be- tween an HTSUS sub-heading and TSUS item and stating that “[w]e can safely assume that Congress changed the language for a reason”
• discussing the canon of construction expressio unius est exclusio alterius — “the expression of one is the exclusion of others” — when a phrase starts with the word “including”
• characterizing the first step as “construing] the relevant (competing) classification headings”
• characterizing the first step as “constru[ing] the relevant (competing) classification headings”
• \A change in the language of a statute is generally construed to import a change in meaning. . . .\
• “[A] change in the language of a statute is generally construed to import a change in meaning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).