Skip to main content
· 4/11/1994

Mita Copystar America v. United States

Citations

  • 21 F.3d 1079
  • 16 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1033
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7017
  • 1994 WL 117184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the well settled principle of law that merchandise is classified in its condition as imported thereby precluding classification as unmixed products because the fact that the substances had to be mixed prior to use was not relevant
  • “[i]t is well settled law that merchandise is classified according to its condition when imported”
  • “[A]bsent a showing of legal error in the construction of a tariff term, we, like the trial court, should uphold a Customs’ classification decision.”
  • “It is well settled law that merchandise is classified according to its condition when imported.”
  • “A court may rely upon its own understanding of terms used, and may consult standard lexicographic and scientific authorities, to determine the common meaning of a tariff term.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michel, Clevenger, Schall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.