Federal Circuit· 10/7/1999
Libas, Ltd. v. United States
Citations
- 193 F.3d 1361
- 52 Fed. R. Serv. 821
- 21 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1545
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 24966
- 1999 WL 796302
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding in that case that either “a Dauberh-styie analysis” or “some other equally searching” analysis was required
- stating that the Daubert factors are an appropriate starting point in certain Customs classification cases
- noting that the HTSUS “is indeed a statute but is not published physically in the United States Code”
- noting that the chapter and section notes of the HTSUS are statutory law, not optional interpretive rules
- noting that the chapter and section notes of the HTSUS are statutory law, not optional interpretive rules
- treating Note 4 to Chapter 52 as having the same weight as statutory language
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Michel, Gajarsa, Cudahy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nourain B. Niam, and Peter Blagoev, Iordanka Kissiova, and Iana Kissiova v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2004-01-07· cited 162×
- Veryzer v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesFederal Claims· 2011-02-17· cited 131×
- Astra Aktiebolag v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.S.D. New York· 2002-10-16· cited 63×
- Libas, Ltd. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2003-01-07· cited 54×
- Park B. Smith, Ltd., Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2003-10-21· cited 52×
- Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2013-12-03· cited 46×
- Rochkind v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-08-28· cited 39×
- Libas Ltd. v. CarilloNinth Circuit· 2003-05-28· cited 25×
- LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. v. Whirlpool Corp.N.D. Illinois· 2009-09-28· cited 21×
- Wayne I. Elliott, Francis Maritote, J. Brian Schaer and Jonathan A. Sion v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionSeventh Circuit· 2000-02-03· cited 19×
- Okerlund v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2002-08-23· cited 18×
- Fabil Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2001-01-23· cited 15×
- Victoria's Secret Direct, LLC v. United StatesCourt of International Trade· 2013-05-01· cited 14×
- In Re Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.S.D. New York· 2011-02-22· cited 13×
- Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-11-30· cited 11×
- Lerner New York, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of International Trade· 2013-05-01· cited 10×
- Kahrs International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of International Trade· 2009-09-18· cited 9×
- The Pomeroy Collection, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of International Trade· 2008-05-27· cited 8×
- Michael Simon Design, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of International Trade· 2006-08-24· cited 8×
- United States v. RobertsM.D. Tennessee· 2011-11-17· cited 8×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 11,658×
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court· 1999-03-23· cited 8,651×
- Carl J. Perreira and Christina J. Perreira, Parents and Next Friend of Carly C. Perreira v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesFederal Circuit· 1994-08-31· cited 1,170×
- United States v. Randolph JakobetzSecond Circuit· 1992-01-09· cited 280×
- Trans-Orient Marine Corporation v. Star Trading & Marine, Inc., and the Republic of the SudanSecond Circuit· 1991-02-06· cited 191×
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1997-04-24· cited 190×
- United States of America Government of the Virgin Islands v. Edwin VelasquezThird Circuit· 1995-12-06· cited 102×
- Rollerblade, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1997-04-24· cited 83×
- Simod America Corp. v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1989-04-19· cited 80×
- Marubeni America Corp. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1994-09-07· cited 76×
- Refac International, Ltd. And Forward Reference Systems, Ltd. v. Lotus Development CorporationFederal Circuit· 1996-07-08· cited 67×
- United States v. Hitachi America, Ltd., Defendant/cross-Appellant, and Hitachi, Ltd., Defendant/cross-AppellantFederal Circuit· 1999-03-25· cited 42×
Other cases named Libas, Ltd. v. United States
7 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Libas, Ltd. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2003-01-07· cited 54×
- Libas, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of International Trade· 2000-08-29· cited 5×
- Libas, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of International Trade· 1996-10-04· cited 4×
- Libas, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of International Trade· 2003-08-13· cited 3×
- Libas, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of International Trade· 2002-05-13· cited 1×
- Libas, Ltd. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2004-05-17
- Libas, Ltd. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2004-11-10
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.