Skip to main content
Federal Circuit· 10/7/1999

Libas, Ltd. v. United States

Citations

  • 193 F.3d 1361
  • 52 Fed. R. Serv. 821
  • 21 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1545
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 24966
  • 1999 WL 796302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding in that case that either “a Dauberh-styie analysis” or “some other equally searching” analysis was required
  • stating that the Daubert factors are an appropriate starting point in certain Customs classification cases
  • noting that the HTSUS “is indeed a statute but is not published physically in the United States Code”
  • noting that the chapter and section notes of the HTSUS are statutory law, not optional interpretive rules
  • noting that the chapter and section notes of the HTSUS are statutory law, not optional interpretive rules
  • treating Note 4 to Chapter 52 as having the same weight as statutory language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michel, Gajarsa, Cudahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Libas, Ltd. v. United States

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.