Kim v. Comptroller of Treasury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that pleading identifying administrative decision from which relief is sought may be held to substantially comply with content requirement of Md. Rule 7~202(c)
• recognizing that pleading identifying administrative decision from which relief is sought may be held to substantially comply with content requirement of Md. Rule 7-202(c)
• explaining that the 30-day requirement of Md. Rule 7-203(a) is not jurisdictional but, rather, is in the nature of a statute of limitations
• stating that “[statutes of limitation are not ordinarily jurisdictional, and are generally waivable.... ”
• stating that “statutes of limitation are not ordinarily jurisdictional, and are generally waivable ....”
• defining “suit” as “[a]ny proceeding by a party or parties against another in a court of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).