In Re Samone H.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a denial of a request to change a permanency plan is not appealable
• stating that the statutory scheme was enacted to insure that actions be taken in the child’s best interests when committed to the Department of Social Services
• stating that “[a] parent’s interest in raising a child is, no doubt, a fundamental right, recognized by the United States Supreme Court and this Court”
• noting that an order that does not deprive a mother of custody of her children or detrimentally change her terms of custody is not immediately appealable under § 12-303(3)(x)
• noting that an order that does not deprive a mother of custody of her children or detrimentally change her terms of custody is not immediately appealable under § 12-303(3)(x)
• stating that “(a] parent’s interest in raising a child is, no doubt, a fundamental right, recognized by the United States Supreme Court and this Court,” and cataloguing cases); In re Yve S., 373 Md. 551, 565-66, 819 A.2d 1030, 1038-39 (2003

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).