Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court· 4/29/2003

Roell v. Withrow

Citations

  • 538 U.S. 580
  • 123 S. Ct. 1696
  • 155 L. Ed. 2d 775
  • 2003 U.S. LEXIS 3427

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that parties may authorize a full-time magistrate judge to preside over a civil trial via implied consent
  • concluding that parties may authorize a full-time magistrate judge to preside over a civil trial via implied consent
  • holding that under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) parties may consent to proceedings before a magistrate judge through their litigation conduct
  • concluding that parties may authorize a full-time magistrate judge to preside over a civil trial via implied consent
  • holding that consent to a magistrate judge’s authority does not require compliance with specific procedures
  • holding that parties may impliedly consent when a bankruptcy judge hears evidence and testimony without objection by the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Souter, Rehnquist, O'Connor, Ginsburg, Breyer, Thomas, Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

126 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Roell v. Withrow

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.