United States v. Will

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the rule of necessity is an exception to the recusal requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 455
• holding that where every Article III judge had an interest in the outcome of the case, the common law rule of necessity prevailed
• holding that where every Article III judge had an interest in the outcome of the case, the common law rule of necessity prevailed
• holding that the rule of necessity is an exception to the recusal requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 455
• holding that the rule of necessity is an exception to the recusal requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 455
• holding that certain federal laws stopping or reducing previously authorized pay increases for federal judges violated the Constitution’s Compensation Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).