Beverly Chambless v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “eight months of continual participation in pretrial proceedings justifies the inference of consent” where plaintiff “consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction over her original case”
• explaining that the “‘mixed-motive’ defense . . . concedes that an improper motive played a role in the employer’s action while asserting that another, valid reason would have resulted in the same decision”
• “[T]he Supreme Court held in Roell v. Withrow, 538 U.S. 580, 123 S. Ct. 1696, 155 L. Ed. 2d 775 (2003
• “[T]he Supreme Court held in Roell v. Withrow, 538 U.S. 580, 123 S. Ct. 1696, 155 L. Ed. 2d 775 (2003
• “[T]he Supreme Court held in Roell v. Withrow, 538 U.S. 580, 123 S. Ct. 1696, 155 L. Ed. 2d 775 (2003
• “[T]he Supreme Court held in Roell v. Withrow, 538 U.S. 580, 123 S. Ct. 1696, 155 L. Ed. 2d 775 (2003

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).