Fifth Circuit· 4/8/2002
Withrow v. Roell
Citations
- 288 F.3d 199
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 6430
- 2002 WL 522877
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that magistrate judge must secure consent of all parties before acting pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jolly, Jones, Barksdale
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wilhelm v. RotmanNinth Circuit· 2012-05-25· cited 2,067×
- Roell v. WithrowSupreme Court· 2003-04-29· cited 321×
- Moore v. CainFifth Circuit· 2002-07-11· cited 71×
- United States v. Bolivar-MunozFifth Circuit· 2002-11-20· cited 44×
- Johnson v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2006-03-13· cited 17×
- Roell v. WithrowSupreme Court· 2002-11-04
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Larry D. Drake and Rosalie E. Drake v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing CompanySeventh Circuit· 1998-01-21· cited 287×
- Wazirali Moosa, Also Known as Wazir Ali Haider Ali Moosa Zebunisa Wazirali Moosa v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceFifth Circuit· 1999-04-02· cited 179×
- Leroy L. Trufant v. Autocon, Inc., a Subsidiary of Camco, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1984-03-21· cited 83×
- Paul Edward Archie, Paul Edward Archie v. David A. ChristianFifth Circuit· 1987-02-04· cited 68×
- Hill v. City of Seven PointsFifth Circuit· 2000-10-11· cited 53×
- Wheeler v. City of ColumbusFifth Circuit· 1982-09-30· cited 45×
- Mendes Junior International Company v. M/v Sokai Maru, Atlanta Maritime Corporation and Sanko Kisen KkFifth Circuit· 1992-12-08· cited 41×
- United States v. Bustos-UsecheFifth Circuit· 2001-11-14· cited 36×
- Roosevelt Ford v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsFifth Circuit· 1984-09-04· cited 33×
- Walker v. City of MesquiteFifth Circuit· 1999-04-06· cited 32×
- Rachel Rembert v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityEleventh Circuit· 2000-06-05· cited 26×
- Kenneth D. Hajek v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Corporation Montana Rail Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1999-08-05· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.