Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 8/12/1991
Rodriques v. Furtado
Citations
- 575 N.E.2d 1124
- 410 Mass. 878
- 1991 Mass. LEXIS 431
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- policy of allowing police officers to seek warrants without authorization of supervisors does not constitute threats, intimidation or coercion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Liacos, Wilkins, Abrams, O'Connor, Greaney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Swain v. SpinneyFirst Circuit· 1997-06-26· cited 222×
- Jones v. Kmart Corp.California Supreme Court· 1998-01-29· cited 144×
- Commonwealth v. SbordoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-05-01· cited 109×
- Commonwealth v. ThomasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-04-15· cited 58×
- Commonwealth v. ELM Medical Laboratories, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1992-07-24· cited 49×
- United States v. Dale Robert BachEighth Circuit· 2002-11-18· cited 37×
- Theresa Lyons and Dennis Lyons v. National Car Rental Systems, Inc. (Of Delaware)First Circuit· 1994-09-12· cited 36×
- Gregory Baldwin v. City of Estherville, Iowa Matt Reineke, Individually and in His Official Capacity as an Officer of the Estherville Police Department and Matt Hellickson, Individually and in His Official Capacity as an Officer of the Estherville Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Iowa· 2018-06-29· cited 36×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-12-20· cited 35×
- Bellville v. Town of NorthboroFirst Circuit· 2004-07-09· cited 31×
- Glovsky v. Roche Bros. Supermarkets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2014-10-10· cited 29×
- Broderick v. RoacheD. Massachusetts· 1992-10-06· cited 26×
- Spencer v. RocheD. Massachusetts· 2010-11-08· cited 26×
- LaChance v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2012-11-27· cited 24×
- Canney v. City of ChelseaD. Massachusetts· 1996-05-07· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. PropheteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-03-01· cited 22×
- LaChance v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2016-10-21· cited 20×
- Longval v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-02-23· cited 20×
- Chaabouni v. City of BostonD. Massachusetts· 2001-02-27· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. MoralesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2012-05-29· cited 15×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court· 1987-06-25· cited 12,768×
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 11,438×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court· 1986-03-05· cited 6,748×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1952-01-02· cited 3,286×
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court· 1975-04-14· cited 2,195×
- United States v. Montoya De HernandezSupreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 982×
- Winston v. LeeSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 733×
- LaLonde v. EissnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-06-19· cited 613×
- Ruth Blackburn v. Linwood SnowFirst Circuit· 1985-09-20· cited 217×
- Bally v. Northeastern UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-01-09· cited 204×
- Bell v. MazzaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-03-04· cited 171×
- Commonwealth v. CastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-07-11· cited 141×
- Duarte v. HealyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-05-10· cited 114×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.